Battle against latest U.S. offshore wind pause reaches courts
Inevitably, offshore wind developers are looking to the courts to overturn the pause imposed by the Department of the Interior on Dec. 22, 2025 on the leases for all large-scale offshore wind projects under construction in the United States, citing “national security risks identified by the Department of War in recently completed classified reports.” Those risks, it seems, relate to radar clutter.
An earlier blanket offshore wind pause was struck down In a ruling in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Judge Patti B. Saris who found that the sweeping ban was “arbitrary and capricious.” That case had been brought by New York State Attorney Letitia James, leading a coalition of 17 attorneys general, and the Alliance for Clean Energy New York.
Dominion Energy takes legal action
First to seek injunctive relief against the latest pause was Dominion Energy, whose Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project is among those paused. Today, the Virginian Pilot reports that U.S. District Judge Jamar Walker of the Eastern District of Virginia issued an order Sunday that, says the newspaper, “changed a motion for a temporary restraining order iomednto a less urgent order for a preliminary injunction.
He also directed that the federal government present the court with “any and all classified information it contends informed the decision to issue the stop work order.”
The court order, reports the Virginian Pilot, schedules a Jan. 16 hearing in Norfolk, Va., on the preliminary injunction request and gives the federal government until Jan. 9 to present the evidence for the government to review.
Revolution Wind challenges new pause
More court challenges are in the works. Yesterday, Jan. 1, Revolution Wind LLC, a 50/50 joint venture between Global Infrastructure Partners’ Skyborn Renewables and Ørsted, filed a supplemental complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the Dec. 22 lease suspension order ), to be followed by a motion for a preliminary injunction.
“While Revolution Wind continues to seek to work constructively with the Administration and other stakeholders towards an expeditious and durable resolution of this matter, it believes that the lease suspension order violates applicable law,” says Ørsted. “As was the case with the August 2025 stop-work order, the Revolution Wind Project faces substantial harm from a continuation of the lease suspension order. As a result, litigation is a necessary step to protect the rights of the project.”
Revolution Wind secured all required federal and state permits in 2023, following extensive reviews that began more than nine years ago, notes Ørsted.
“As a requirement of the permitting process, the project engaged in years-long consultation with the U.S Department of Defense [War] Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse to address potential impacts to national security and defense capabilities from construction through to operation of the project,” says the company. “Those consultations resulted in a fully executed formal agreement between the Department of War, pthe Department of the Air Force, and Revolution Wind outlining mitigation measures by the project.
Sunrise Wind LLC, a separate project and wholly owned subsidiary of Ørsted that also received a lease suspension order on December 22 continues to evaluate all options to resolve the matter, including engagement with relevant agencies and stakeholders and considering legal proceedings.
The post Battle against latest U.S. offshore wind pause reaches courts appeared first on Marine Log.
Nick Blenkey
Go to marinelog