{"id":12330,"date":"2025-06-30T01:02:32","date_gmt":"2025-06-30T01:02:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/?p=12330"},"modified":"2025-06-30T01:02:32","modified_gmt":"2025-06-30T01:02:32","slug":"alberta-is-gearing-up-for-a-new-oil-pipeline-to-prince-rupert","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/?p=12330","title":{"rendered":"Alberta is Gearing Up for a New Oil Pipeline to Prince Rupert"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>    Alberta is Gearing Up for a New Oil Pipeline to Prince Rupert<br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><br \/>\n    <!-- no image --><br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Alberta&#8217;s top provincial leader believes that now that Canada has a growing national consensus on the need to fast-track seaborne oil exports, a privately-backed proposal to build a new oil pipeline from Alberta&#8217;s tar sands fields to the port of Prince Rupert could be announced sometime this summer.<\/p>\n<p>The oil industry is the province&#8217;s economic mainstay, and its desire for export capacity has long been a source of friction with its neighbors. For years, activists and politicians in British Columbia opposed an expansion of the only pipeline system from Alberta to the Pacific &#8211; the Trans Mountain line &#8211; and the Canadian federal government finally nationalized the project to complete it (at great financial cost).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>That existing 900,000 bpd line ends in a terminal in Burnaby, B.C., which is restricted to partial loads on small Aframax tankers because of draft restrictions in Vancouver&#8217;s harbor. The tanker size limit increases transport costs. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Albertan exporters would rather have access to a deeper harbor, and Prince Rupert more than qualifies. It is the deepest ice-free natural harbor in North America, with a depth at the inner harbor entrance of 115 feet. This is deep enough to navigate a fully-laden VLCC, the most economical tanker class for long-distance trade.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>At present, however, that would be illegal: Canada has a federal ban on large tankers in northern British Columbia&#8217;s Inside Passage, one of the most remote and environmentally-pristine coastlines in North America. But with changing geopolitical winds and strained relations with Canada&#8217;s biggest oil buyer, the United States, Canada&#8217;s political leaders have reached a consensus agreement that diversified energy exports must now come first. This time, B.C. premier David Eby has raised only one objection: if a new pipeline happens, it must be privately funded.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>That plan appears to be in the works. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith told Bloomberg that it is &#8220;probably weeks&#8221; before a private party puts out a proposal for a new pipeline to Prince Rupert. It would be &#8220;the most credible and the most economic of all of the pipeline proposals the private sector would consider,&#8221; she told Bloomberg this week.<\/p>\n<p>The last comparable proposal &#8211; Enbridge&#8217;s Northern Gateway line to Kitimat, a small port in the Great Bear Rainforest &#8211; was rejected by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2016.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> \t<BR><br \/>\n <BR><\/BR><\/p>\n<p> \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.maritime-executive.com\/article\/alberta-is-gearing-up-for-a-new-oil-pipeline-to-prince-rupert\">Go to maritime executive<\/a><br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n <BR><\/BR><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Alberta is Gearing Up for a New Oil Pipeline to Prince Rupert \u00a0 Alberta&#8217;s top provincial leader believes that now that Canada has a growing national consensus on the need to fast-track seaborne oil exports, a privately-backed proposal to build a new oil pipeline from Alberta&#8217;s tar sands fields to the port of Prince Rupert [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[59],"class_list":["post-12330","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-maritime-executive","tag-maritime-executive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12330"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12330"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12330\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12330"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12330"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}