{"id":13328,"date":"2025-07-17T01:02:26","date_gmt":"2025-07-17T01:02:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/?p=13328"},"modified":"2025-07-17T01:02:26","modified_gmt":"2025-07-17T01:02:26","slug":"ustr-port-fee-proposal-puts-a-dent-in-china-s-shipbuilding-dominance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/?p=13328","title":{"rendered":"USTR Port Fee Proposal Puts a Dent in China&#8217;s Shipbuilding Dominance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>    USTR Port Fee Proposal Puts a Dent in China&#8217;s Shipbuilding Dominance<br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><br \/>\n    <!-- no image --><br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Chinese shipbuilders are already feeling the pinch from the Trump administration&#8217;s unprecedented port fee proposal, even though the details have not yet been released in final form. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative&#8217;s fee schedule would increase the cost of doing business at U.S. seaports for all Chinese-built ships, in hopes of jumpstarting demand for American shipbuilding and undercutting the dominance of Chinese state industrialists.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Whether or not it prompts a resurgence at U.S. shipyards, the USTR plan is already driving international shipowners to reconsider the idea of ordering at market-leading Chinese shipyards. If a Chinese-made ship costs more to operate to and from the United States, then a Korean or Japanese ship may be a better overall value proposition on a lifecycle basis, even if it is more expensive up-front. Owners appear to be taking that bet, based on the latest numbers from Bimco and Clarksons.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>By Bimco&#8217;s tally, China led the world market in sales in the first six months of the year &#8211; but by a much smaller margin, just 52 percent of all tonnage, down from 72 percent in the same period last year. The overall market was also smaller: total global sales numbers plummeted by half compared to the first six months of 2024, led by a sharp drop in bulker orders. This sounds drastic, but Clarksons notes that the drop brings the sales volume back down to earth after a period of hyperactive ordering; when considered against the 10-year average, the first half of 2025 was reasonably typical. Boxship ordering still remains remarkably elevated at nearly double the10-year average pace.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>None of these changes will threaten China&#8217;s market-leading position in the immediate term. CSSC and its compatriot yards still hold a commanding share of the world&#8217;s existing orderbook &#8211; nearly 60 percent by CGT &#8211; but the drop in new-order share represents a hefty chunk out of China&#8217;s future shipbuilding revenue. South Korea is the leading beneficiary, gaining 25 percent global marketshare in the first half, up from 15 percent year-on-year. Korean yards even picked up the majority of the world&#8217;s new orders in the month of March (quickly reversed again in April).\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> \t<BR><br \/>\n <BR><\/BR><\/p>\n<p> \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.maritime-executive.com\/article\/ustr-port-fee-proposal-puts-a-dent-in-china-s-shipbuilding-dominance\">Go to maritime executive<\/a><br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n <BR><\/BR><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>USTR Port Fee Proposal Puts a Dent in China&#8217;s Shipbuilding Dominance \u00a0 Chinese shipbuilders are already feeling the pinch from the Trump administration&#8217;s unprecedented port fee proposal, even though the details have not yet been released in final form. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative&#8217;s fee schedule would increase the cost of doing business [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[59],"class_list":["post-13328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-maritime-executive","tag-maritime-executive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13328"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13328\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}