![\"Greenpeace](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.marineinsight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Greenpeace-300x157.jpg?resize=300%2C157&ssl=1\")
<\/div>\n![\"Greenpeace\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.marineinsight.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Greenpeace.jpg?resize=1200%2C628&ssl=1\")
A group of 22 Greenpeace activists from Belgium, Germany, and Poland blocked a U.S. LNG tanker from reaching Brunsb\u00fcttel, Germany.<\/p>\n
The activists used kayaks and other floating objects to create a blockade in the waters, holding up a massive 100-meter banner that read \u201cGas destroys \u2013 Stop fossil gas.\u201d Their protest came with a clear message asking the German government and the European Union to stop relying on fossil fuels, especially U.S. LNG.<\/p>\n
It was the first U.S. liquefied natural gas shipment to Germany since the U.S. presidential election. Greenpeace has strongly opposed Europe\u2019s increasing dependence on U.S. fossil fuels, saying it\u2019s a step backwards in the fight against climate change.<\/p>\n
Mira Jaeger, an energy expert with Greenpeace, expressed concern that turning to U.S. LNG would only prolong Europe\u2019s reliance on fossil fuels. She called for urgent action to shift to renewable energy.<\/p>\n
The main issue Greenpeace has with US LNG is its production process, specifically fracking. This method, which injects high-pressure fluid into underground rock formations to release gas, is banned in several European countries because of its harmful environmental and health impacts. Despite Germany banning fracking in 2017, it still imports large amounts of LNG from the US.<\/p>\n
Greenpeace says that US LNG is even more harmful to the environment than coal, especially in terms of climate change. John No\u00ebl, a deputy director at Greenpeace USA, pointed out that increasing LNG exports only benefits large oil and gas companies while raising energy prices for ordinary people.<\/p>\n
He added that the international community should avoid purchasing US LNG, as it contributes to further environmental damage.<\/p>\n
The protest also brought attention to the impact of the LNG industry on local communities in the US. Travis Dardar, a fisherman from Louisiana, shared his frustration with the industry\u2019s harm to his community.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis tanker represents the harm to my community. It\u2019s poisoning our families and ruining our way of life,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Anne Rolfes, the director of the Louisiana Bucket Brigade, an environmental group, reiterated Dardar\u2019s concerns. She said that LNG export projects not only harm local communities but also exacerbate climate change.<\/p>\n
\u201cLNG is not the clean energy solution people think it is,\u201d she said. \u201cIt\u2019s harming both the environment and the people living in the areas where it\u2019s being extracted.\u201d<\/p>\n
Reports reveal that EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen may consider increasing LNG imports from the US to avoid tariffs from President-elect Donald Trump.<\/p>\n
However, Greenpeace and other environmental groups argue that relying on US fossil fuels only delays the transition to renewable energy sources.<\/p>\n
A recent report also raised questions about the necessity of more LNG import terminals in Europe, suggesting that many of these new facilities could remain underused by 2030.<\/p>\n
Greenpeace calls for an immediate halt to the construction of new fossil fuel projects and a stronger focus on renewable energy.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis protest is a wake-up call for Europe,\u201d said Dardar. \u201cWe have to stop supporting fossil fuels that destroy our planet and our health. It\u2019s time to invest in a clean, green future.\u201d<\/p>\n
Reference: Greenpeace<\/p>\n<\/div>\n