ICS: \u201cMuch work still needed\u201d on IMO GHG reduction plans
\n \t
\n
<\/BR>
\n
\n \t
\n
<\/BR><\/p>\n
How much closer are we to IMO GHG reduction regulations that include putting a price on ships\u2019 GHG emissions? Following a week of discussions by an IMO working group,<\/a> Guy Platten, secretary general of the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), emphasized the need for urgent progress ahead of the critical IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 83) session in April.<\/p>\n \u201cWhile ICS is broadly satisfied with the progress made on a radical new package of global GHG reduction regulations, including a GHG emissions pricing mechanism, much work urgently remains to be done,\u201d he said. \u201cBut despite divergence on many issues, it is encouraging that negotiations continue in a positive and cooperative spirit.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWith only six weeks remaining before the MEPC in April , we remain confident that IMO Member States be able to seal the deal and approve fit for purpose amendments to the MARPOL Convention.<\/p>\n ICS says that no major breakthrough was reached towards a final agreement about a universal levy on ships\u2019 GHG emissions, which is widely supported by the shipping industry as the best mechanism to accelerate the transition to net-zero emissions by 2050.<\/p>\n \u201cEncouragingly,\u201d says ICS, \u201cabout three quarters of IMO states now strongly support the GHG contribution system proposed<\/a> by the \u201950-plus group\u2019 of governments and ICS. However, concerns raised by a significant minority, including China and Brazil, must be addressed in a simple and pragmatic way to build complete consensus.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cA major positive outcome is the broad agreement among governments to establish an IMO Fund, a concept ICS has long championed,\u201d says ICS. \u201cIt has also been generally agreed that this IMO Fund, expected to generate billions of U.S. dollars annually from charges for ship\u2019s GHG emissions, should be used to provide financial rewards for first movers and ships using ZNZ [zero and near zero] fuels (such as green methanol, biomethane, green ammonia, and sustainable biofuels). These incentives are crucial for narrowing the cost gap with conventional marine fuels and catalysing the production and uptake of new fuels.\u201d<\/p>\n ICS says that significant details remain unresolved regarding the proposed GHG intensity fuel standard. However, ICS is pleased that its simpler proposal for GHG surcharge fees, which would be applied to ships unable to comply due to fuel availability constraints, remains under consideration.<\/p>\n \u201cImportantly,\u201d says ICS, \u201cwe have seen widespread support from developing countries for this more simple and transparent approach instead of an overly complex system requiring ships to trade compliance units with unpredictable and volatile pricing. Another key issue for shipowners is whether pooled compliance among different shipping companies will be permitted, given the expected limited availability of compliant marine fuels.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cTo ensure progress, ICS will continue to put forward pragmatic and constructive proposals to bridge differences, particularly on the crucial issue of economic incentives for the use of ZNZ fuels,\u201d Platten said. \u201cAchieving consensus is crucial for delivering the goals of the revised GHG Reduction Strategy, which were unanimously agreed by all governments in 2023.\u201d<\/p>\n The post ICS: \u201cMuch work still needed\u201d on IMO GHG reduction plans<\/a> appeared first on Marine Log<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\nUNIVERSAL LEVY ON GHG EMISSIONS<\/h4>\n
AGREEMENT ON IMO FUND<\/h4>\n
GHG FUEL STANDARD<\/h4>\n