{"id":7669,"date":"2025-04-14T01:02:14","date_gmt":"2025-04-14T01:02:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/?p=7669"},"modified":"2025-04-14T01:02:14","modified_gmt":"2025-04-14T01:02:14","slug":"russian-ambassador-says-subsea-tampering-is-no-cause-for-concern","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/?p=7669","title":{"rendered":"Russian Ambassador Says Subsea Tampering off UK is No Cause for Concern"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>    Russian Ambassador Says Subsea Tampering off UK is No Cause for Concern<br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><br \/>\n    <!-- no image --><br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>After recent reports of Russian vessels planting subsea listening devices in waters near the UK, Russia&#8217;s ambassador to London told BBC that there was no reason for concern &#8211; though he did not deny that the\u00a0Russian military\u00a0has been at work on Britain&#8217;s\u00a0seabed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I am not going to deny it, but I wonder whether we really have an interest in following all the British submarine with very old outdated nuclear warheads,&#8221; Ambassador Andrei Kelin said in an interview. &#8220;All these threats are extremely exaggerated . . . absolutely, there is no threat at all from Russia to the UK.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The devices in question are acoustic monitors, believed to be\u00a0designed to track the movements of the Royal Navy&#8217;s Vanguard-class nuclear ballistic missile submarines. The UK is one of the few nations that maintain an at-sea nuclear deterrent patrol, and while a\u00a0submarine is the most survivable nuclear launch platform,\u00a0its edge depends upon stealth. At least three nations &#8211; the U.S., China and Russia &#8211; maintain subsea listening networks in an attempt to track adversaries&#8217; submarines; some of these efforts are well-documented and elaborate, like the U.S. Navy&#8217;s SOSUS listening station system.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>More than a dozen former military officials told The Times that Russia is using its subsea expertise in an attempt to track the Vanguard-class patrols. The report explains the Royal Navy&#8217;s sudden interest in acquiring two offshore vessels for subsea monitoring and intervention, RFA <em>Proteus <\/em>and RFA <em>Stirling Castle.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We are seeing phenomenal amounts of Russian activity,&#8221; one senior British official told The Times. &#8220;There should be no doubt, there is a war raging in the Atlantic.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The most concerning threat is Russia&#8217;s singular capability to wage subsea warfare. Russia&#8217;s military has a dedicated and separate subsea branch, the Main Directorate of Deep-Sea Research (GUGI), with its own fleet of ultra-deep-diving minisubmarines. These miniature nuclear-powered vessels are among the most secretive subs in the world, and are purpose-built for tapping communications cables, cutting lines or planting explosives in the ocean&#8217;s\u00a0depths. If used for attacks on the UK&#8217;s subsea power cables, offshore gas pipelines and data cables, these capabilities could in theory be used to cause significant economic disruption &#8211; like disabling the UK power grid, or cutting off the data connection between London&#8217;s banking sector and New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Even more concerning, &#8220;there are cables that are not public,&#8221; one military official told The Times. &#8220;The Russians have the capability to cut military cables.&#8221;<br \/>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> \t<BR><br \/>\n <BR><\/BR><\/p>\n<p> \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.maritime-executive.com\/article\/russian-ambassador-says-subsea-tampering-is-no-cause-for-concern\">Go to maritime executive<\/a><br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n <BR><\/BR><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Russian Ambassador Says Subsea Tampering off UK is No Cause for Concern \u00a0 After recent reports of Russian vessels planting subsea listening devices in waters near the UK, Russia&#8217;s ambassador to London told BBC that there was no reason for concern &#8211; though he did not deny that the\u00a0Russian military\u00a0has been at work on Britain&#8217;s\u00a0seabed. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[59],"class_list":["post-7669","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-maritime-executive","tag-maritime-executive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7669"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7669"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7669\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7669"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/krogragg.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}